Controversial Decision Analysis

Analyzing Close and Controversial Fights

When judges disagree significantly or when decisions contradict statistical advantages, analyzing the data reveals what happened.

Types of Controversial Decisions

• Split Decision - Two judges for one fighter, one for the other
• Majority Decision - Two judges agree on winner, one scores draw
• Majority Draw - Two judges score draw, one picks a winner
• Wide Scorecard Disparity - Judges see fight very differently

Analyzing the Statistics

• Compare CompuBox totals to official scorecards
• Identify swing rounds that could go either way
• Check for late-round surges that influence judges
• Look for knockdown impact on overall scoring

Common Statistical Patterns

• Winner in total punches landed doesn't always win decision
• Power punch advantage often outweighs jab advantage
• Single knockdown can overcome statistical disadvantage
• Effective aggression in later rounds influences judges more